CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Satz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 16:37:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
First, Murray Perahia gives us an excellent set of Bach's English Suites.
He then continues with the Goldberg Variations which receives sterling
reviews.  Now, Perahia issues three Bach keyboard concertos - BWV 1052,
1053, and 1055.  The man is on a march with Bach which I hope continues
toward the WTC and Art of Fugue.  In his keyboard concerto disc, Sony
89245, Perahia also has the conducting honors as he leads the Academy
of St.  Martin in the Fields.

Due to circumstances entirely within my control, this will be a short
review.  I did compare Perahia's BWV 1052 to that of Cyprien Katsaris
partnered by the Franz Liszt Chamber Orchestra led by Janos Rolla.  The
first movement belongs to Katsaris who is uniformly strong and thrilling,
a fantastic performance.  By comparision, Perahia has a tendency to soften
and lose some fire in his belly.  In the second movement, I find Katsaris
and company much too slow with an eight minute reading; also, Katsaris
sounds rather flat and uninvolved.  Any lack of strength and projection
that Perahia displays in the first movement disappears in the Adagio.
He is beautifully poetic and projects superbly; a performance in the six
minute range helps considerably.  The third movement is a toss-up.  Perahia
again is very strong and poetic; Katsaris continues in a somewhat flat
manner.  In the orchestral contributions, the roles are reversed.  Rolla's
group is excellently sharp with masterful accenting and phrasing; St.
Martin is smooth and dull in comparison.  Overall, Perahia's BWV 1052 is a
fine reading let down some by his playing in the first movement and the
chamber orchestra's lack-luster third movement.

In the other two concertos, Perahia excels in every movement.
Unfortunately, that non-incisive playing from St.  Martin does not go
away and becomes a consistent negative in relationship to Perahia's
contribution.  Since Perahia's the conductor, I think it's fair to put
the responsibility on his shoulders.

Don's Conclusions:  I feel a little hesitant to not recommend Perahia's
recording very strongly; he certainly delivers "the goods" at all times
except for BWV 1052's first movement.  However, the results of his
conducting are unexceptional and often ordinary.  I often found myself
thinking that matching Perahia with Rolla would yield superior returns.  My
best advice is to sample the third movement of BWV 1052; if the orchestra
sounds fine to you in this movement, the disc should provide much listening
pleasure.  Most likely, the review periodicals will gush over Perahia *and*
his conducting.  The next move is yours, and keep in mind that Perahia only
provides about 53 minutes of music; another concerto could easily have been
accomodated.  I hope Perahia is not veering toward the Pollini disc time
tradition.

Don Satz
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2