Richard Todd ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>I have to concur with Jocelyn Wang. A great many CD covers display the
>looks of a performer, whether they be staid, flamboyant, inspirational or
>whatever. It is only when an artist displays him or (more frequently)
>herself in as a sexual person that we get all hot under the the collar.
>What's going on? If an artist is allowed to present herself however she
>(and her publicity people) want, why should a seductive pose be such a
>problem?
The problem is often that the looks of the artist have outwieghed their
musical abilities with the record company. The Eroica Trio seems to me a
good example. Undoubtedly very cute - and on the CD I have (their debut I
think) we get photos of them in 3 changes of clothes. But I cannot believe
there aren't a number of more talented but less photogenic trios out there.
The other is when the cover verges on the pornographic - and I maintain
that Lara St. John's Bach disc cover verged on the pedophile. I for one
would never have bought that disc in the store.
Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]