CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Gibb <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 13:23:49 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
The subject line reminded me of the magnificent opening line in one of my
favourite entries in Grove Opera: the biography of Tolstoy.  It opens
thus:

   Tolstoy, Lev [Leo] Nikolayevich

   (b Yasnaya Polyana, 28 Aug/9 Sept 1828;
    d Astapovo railway station, 7/20 Nov 1910).

   Russian writer, distinguished hater of opera.  He had some musical
   education: he could play the piano after a fashion and even composed
   waltzes.  Sensitive not only to the pleasures of music but also to
   its `hypnotic' influence and hence its power to uplift or corrupt,
   he maintained that there could be no aesthetic judgment without an
   ethical component.  Good art was art that communicated simple ideas
   and emotions directly and intelligibly, uniting artist and audience
   in accord with Christian teachings.  For Tolstoy opera, with its
   mongrel mixture of media, its needless complexity, its irreality
   and its reliance on flamboyant convention, epitomized the falsity of
   art at its most debased and stood as metaphor for falsity in social
   relations.  The scene of Natasha Rostova's moral downfall in his
   novel Voyna i mir (`War and Peace', 1869) is set fittingly against
   the background of an opera performance ...

The article goes on to comment on the irony of Tolstoy's works
being used as the basis for operas.  The author is Richard
Taruskin.

Mike Gibb
WWW: http://operabase.com/en

ATOM RSS1 RSS2