CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Moderated Classical Music List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:24:48 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>My concern is that not that Wuorinen is barred, but that ANY obscure
>work, even the obscure work of otherwise popular composers will be
>ignored, since at this point we're very close not just to the top
>fifty composers, but to the top fifty pieces. No Bruckner but the
>fourth and ninth symphonies, the last three Tchaikovsky symphonies
>but not the first three, the last three Dvoraks, and so on. How
>friggin' boring.

I agree, yet my question is, what is it that produces a culture where
only the top 50 "sell?" Some suggest it is the notion of that only the
familiar sell.  So why are there so few pieces that are familiar?

It has always seemed to me that any "business" needs to offer new products
to retain market share.  That is the way it is with popular music.  Why
is it not so with classical music...or is that why (assuming it is a
correct assumption) classical music is losing market share?

Karl

             ***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery.  For more information,
go to:  http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2