CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bernard Chasan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 Apr 2005 22:21:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Steve Scwartz asks the musical question,

>Does anybody look forward to Spano's Brahms cycle, as good a conductor
>as he is, when you can get Furtwaengler, Szell, Celibidache, Giulini,
>Horenstein, Markevitch, Kubelik, Stokowski, Toscanini, and Walter?

Steve has a point, but I am somewhat put off by the fact that most of
the recordings he mentions are fifty years old or more.  Is this a healthy
state of affairs?  Shouldn't the new generation of conductors have their
shot if only because they bring a different sensibility to the music?
On the other hand, do we really need another Brahms cycle?

Bernard Chasan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2