CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Moderated Classical Music List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 May 2009 18:43:48 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (106 lines)
[Read online: http://www.classical.net/music/recs/reviews/n/nwr00365a.php]

Leo Sowerby
Piano Trios

*  Trio in c#
*  Suite for Violin, Violoncello, & Pianoforte

La Musica Gioiosa Trio
New World Records NW365-2 Total Time: 69:42

Summary for the Busy Executive: Prodigy and master.

The historicism of music criticism, inherited from the Nineteenth Century,
has mauled aesthetic judgment.  It pushes criteria like influence, an
old-fashioned notion of progress, and heroic resistance against the
bourgeoisie.  I happen to think Schoenberg a great composer, but not
because he influenced a large chunk of other composers.  It strikes me
as perverse, like valuing Norton and Sackville (Gorboduc) over Shakespeare
(The Tempest) or, to go the other way, Edward Albee over Sophocles or
Bruckner over Wagner.  Most disastrously, historicism builds, in the
name of clarity, a curio cabinet with a limited number of bins.  What
doesn't fit, gets left behind.  We come across the discards all the time:
Stenhammar, Bloch, Finzi, Holst, Piston, Pettersson, Holmboe, Weill, and
so on.  Just look at music histories and see who gets left out.  It may
sometimes happen that a discard's music may so overwhelm listeners, that
it gets put into the cabinet.  In my lifetime, this happened to Bruckner,
Mahler, Nielsen, and Martinu.  Of course, some entrepreneur has to take
a chance and incur the wrath of those disappointed that the concert
didn't include Beethoven.

I don't claim to predict the future, but in the current musical climate,
I don't see the Chicago composer Leo Sowerby climbing back into notice
any time soon.  He hasn't the attraction of historical influence or
novelty.  You won't likely find him in a textbook or on the next new-music
program.  Sowerby offers only a powerful sensibility allied to great
craftsmanship.

The first notes of the Trio in c# put it firmly in the School of Cesar
Franck, except that it's far better written than most of that output,
fully the equal of, say, Chausson's Piano Quartet and the Quintet of
Franck himself.  Its 1911 premiere astonishes you.  Sowerby was 16 years
old.  Two years later, the Chicago Symphony Orchestra played his Violin
Concerto.  Really, you have to go back to Mendelssohn to find somebody
comparable at so young an age.  Sowerby at this point needs no further
study with anybody.  He just has to find his way.  Overall, we see a
big, Romantic nature, a love affair with counterpoint and architecture,
and absolute technical mastery over idiomatic music for the instruments
involved.  The first movement - a sonata with four (count 'em, four)
themes - impresses by its solid 15-minute span, at least.  The composer
effortlessly combines and re-combines them.  The slow movement unfolds
as one long melody - a difficult feat for any composer, let alone a
teen-ager.  The scherzo is a divertissement and provides a shrewd moment
of respite before the hard-charging rondo-tarantella finale.  People
uncomfortable with Modernism say they wish composers would write like
this.  Apparently, composers did, even contemporary with Petrushka.

The second trio (yet another, written around the same time of the first,
is lost) appears roughly forty years later.  Aside from more advanced,
mainly quartal harmony, it shares many large traits with its older sib:
imposing structure, contrapuntal gymnastics, and a concern for instruments
sounding as good as they can.  However, it also benefits from Sowerby's
greater experience.  The earlier trio sounds rich, but also at times
thick, mainly because the young Sowerby can't resist indulging his
keyboard virtuosity.  Every finger just *has* to be doing something, and
sometimes the piano part makes the strings superfluous.  Now, the older,
wiser composer shows a greater concern for clarity of ensemble without,
I must say, sacrificing any power.  Indeed, the work gains on that score,
in my opinion.  One notices an interesting attempt to fuse baroque forms
with classical sonata procedures in the first movement.  The work opens
very much like a passacaglia, moves to sonata form, and at the end of
the development, breaks into fugue on the "passacaglia" subject.  That
theme is interesting in itself.  It breaks into two halves, with the
second half the first turned topsy-turvy.  This observation isn't confined
to an "eye" study of the score.  A listener can easily hear it.  Indeed,
Sowerby constructs a drama based on the symmetry.  He treats the halves
as one theme as well as breaks them in two and works with them separately.
He combines them simultaneously.  A second subject provides necessary
contrast, but even here the composer can't resist putting both subjects
together in what sounds like effortless contrapuntal pyrotechnique.  The
meditative second movement - largely A-B-A, two quiet sections framing
a fiery middle - opens with a gorgeous Hindemithian duet for the two
string instruments alone.  At the entry of the piano, we get something
different, akin to the English Pastoral School.  Although the description
may strike you as disjointed, in actual performance the movement coheres.
The finale begins with the solo piano in a manic tarantella, but soon
settles into something else - a sonata-rondo based on a variant of the
passacaglia theme of the first movement.  Counterpoint abounds, but at
a less obvious level.  Sowerby aims less to dazzle you than to keep the
instruments independent.  A work of tremendous integrity.

Karl Davies and Margaret Daly, on violin and cello, do a fine job,
especially in the opening duo of the latter trio's second movement.
Pianist Gail Quillman, who knew the composer personally, plays with
intelligence and fire.  Best of all, the three play as a group, with
nobody dominating.  All three drive the music along.  The readings seem
to come from one mind.

Steve Schwartz

             ***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery.  For more information,
go to:  http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2