James Zehm ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

>Deryk Barker [[log in to unmask]] wrote:
>
>Given this information, I cannot see how one can continue to claim that
>Mahler's piano reduction should be considered a better representation
>of the original Third than Nowak's edition of the original 1873 version
>of the Third.
>
>Because Nowak added brass?

James, I don't understand this remark at all...

Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]