CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Sep 2000 19:48:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Tony Duggan:

>Someone whose opinion I normally value (no one on these Lists) once said
>that Szell was "not a natural Mahlerian" which is think is too harsh.
>His account(s) of the Ninth that I have heard are excellent.

I'd have agreed with that statement, once upon a time when I hadn't heard
his Ninth or his Lied.  I have since, and I agree with Tony.  However, I
still think a Real Mahlerian has to do the entire cycle.  I can't imagine
Szell with the Seventh or the Eighth, for example - to me, the toughest
tests of a Mahler conductor.  Szell also made no secret of the fact that he
thought several of the symphonies weak.  On the other hand, Furtwaengler
thought Beethoven's second symphony a failure, and he's certainly a great
Beethoven conductor.

Steve Schwartz

ATOM RSS1 RSS2