CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Harbin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Moderated Classical Music List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:29:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I find it amazing that Gramophone 'experts' did not spot the fake orchestra
and conductor, neither of which, to my mind, made any recordings in the
past.  Also the fact that major talents were ripped off and not spotted
(eg Haitink ...)

The real question this raises for me is the validity or reviews in the
light of the Hatto scandal.  What does all this say about the standard
of reviews and knowledge?  There has not been enough discussion of this
in Gramophone.  Classicstoday.com did at least compare their Hatto reviews
with some of their original reviews for the original 'real' recordings,
to their credit.

David Harbin
Nottingham UK

             ***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery.  For more information,
go to:  http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2