Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 3 Aug 2000 16:13:06 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Deryk Barker wrote:
>Kevin Sutton ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>>Where have YOU been Andrys. There is no evidence to say that MOST
>>successful conductors have perfect pitch. Many do not.
>
>Including some of the very greatest of all.
>. . .
>OTOH the great Jascha Horenstein did have perfect pitch and once remarked
>that he couldn't bear to listen to Furtwaengler's 1944 Eroica, in his (and
>IMHO) the greatest performance on record, because it was not available ina
>transfer at the proper pitch.
Actually, I was responding to the strange idea that perfect pitch hinders;
it can, if that's all one is focused one on, just as non-perfect pitch can
hinder if one wants to hear the notes quickly in more absolute terms. I
named several modern-day composers listed by one of them on a forum, and
that was just a quick list off the top of his head. Obviously, with the
major ones I named, most of whom are U.S. conductors, PP was not a
problem. Nor did they use this facility only to give a pitch to a chorus.
And to the idea that it is good for only one thing, I listed other, more
useful things one can do with it.
- A
http://andrys.com/books.html
|
|
|