CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Deryk Barker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:54:32 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
David Harbin wrote:

>Cheers Mimi but I love Bruckner.  The difference is that Bruckner's
>symphonies organically grow whist Schubert's The Great just has these
>dreadfully innane 'jolly' tunes that go nowhere.

David, you need to read a good analysis of what Schubert is doing here.
The structure is actually masterly and, again, he is pointing the way
forward, using 3 subjects for his sonata form instead of 2, etc.

>Didn't Bernard Shaw descible it as "the most brainless composition put
>on paper"?

Actually I think it was "exasperatingly brainless", but....

>So much repetition with weak material!

Dangerous ground! Isn't the fundamental motif of Beethoven 5 fairly
uninteresting in itself?

Deryk Barker <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2