Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jul 1999 17:11:23 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Roger Hecht asks:
>Question. How good was the LAPO when Mehta took it over? I was under the
>impression it was less than first rank and got much better under Mehta, but
>from 3000 miles away, I have no idea. I have heard very few, if any, of
>their pre-Mehta recordings.
While not the world class orchestra it became under Carlo Maria Giulini
and presently Esa-Pekka Salonen (we quickly draw a curtain over the Previn
years), it was not a bunch of stiffs by any means. The three previous MDs
were Otto Klemperer (1933-1939), Alfred Wallenstein (1943-1956), and Eduard
van Beinum (1956-1959).
What Mehta did bring to the orchestra was a higher profile through the
marketing done about him. What he also did was make some absolutely
dreadful appointments, a process he repeated in NY.
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|