CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tony Duggan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:24:10 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Jocelyn Wang wrote:

>Whatever the process, and whether one calls it "ignoring" the repeats or
>"disregarding" them, the result is the same: the composer's intent is
>being undermined by someone who does not and cannot know the piece as
>intimately as the composer.

You want to own a recording of a particular piece of music.  _All_ the
recordings available of that work delete _all_ the repeats.  Do you go
ahead and buy one of them, or do you do without?

You want to own a recording of a particular piece of music.  All the
recordings _except one_ delete all the repeats, but the entire range
of critical opinion is agreed that the one recording that includes the
repeat is a travesty of the work in every other instance - sound, playing,
interpretation, recording.  Do you go ahead and buy the turkey? Do you buy
one of the others without the repeats? Or do you do without?

Tony Duggan, England.
Mahler survey:
http://www.musicweb.force9.co.uk/music/Mahler/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2