CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Moderated Classical Music List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:52:40 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (92 lines)
Earl Wild
Modern Piano Concerti

*  Copland: Concerto for Piano and Orchestra
*  Menotti: Concerto in F for Piano and Orchestra*

Earl Wild, piano
Symphony of the Air/Aaron Copland, Jorge Mester*
Vanguard Classics VC3 Total time: 49:23
Available through Arkiv CD (http://www.arkivmusic.com)

Summary for the Busy Executive: Skyscrapers and Scarlatti.

ArkivMusic has quietly (and legally) restored to the catalogue thousands
of classic recordings the major labels have dropped.  I bought the
original Vanguard MONO LP of these concertos in my teens, mainly for the
Menotti.  I had seen a local production of The Medium which spurred me
to the Cleveland Public Library, where I checked out the score and the
recording with Marie Powers.  At that point, I really had little idea
of Menotti's place in the musical world, or even that he was thought of
as an opera specialist.  After all, hadn't he written this concerto?  I
quickly found out that people who knew something about music looked down
on him, but that didn't stop me from liking - a lot - what I heard.

It turns out that for most of his life, Menotti longed for a critical
success like those enjoyed by his friend Samuel Barber, while Barber
yearned for a popular success like Menotti's Amahl and the Night Visitors.
Menotti probably came closest to what he wanted with his violin concerto
(1952).  Still, I've always liked the 1945 piano concerto even more.
Formally, it's a bit of a mess, like a rumpled but favorite uncle, but
it doesn't seem to matter - at least not to me.  In its spirit and its
contrasts, as well as in the general shape of some of its themes, it
recalls very strongly Ravel's G-major concerto.  It's just not as elegant
or as brilliant a composition.  Few other pieces (by anybody) are.  What
it does have are tunes, tunes, tunes - memorable tunes, tunes that ravish
the ear, tunes that make you feel great, tunes that you find yourself
humming for days, months, and years afterwards.  The concerto proceeds
in a straightforward way, with quick sections framing and balancing
lyrical ones.  The first movement explodes into a fugato with exuberant
Scarlatti-like runs in the piano.  A song-like section follows, and we
end up with a recap. The slow movement is nine minutes of gorgeous,
melancholy song.  The finale - which I would call a rondo in a more
solidly-constructed work than this - builds up to a bring-'em-to-their-feet
ending.  Menotti may not be Brahms, but he might very well be Grieg, and
that's not nothing.

Of course, the Copland takes a much thornier approach, although it's
not without considerable humor.  However, where Menotti gives you the
impression of just singing the song that lives within him, Copland
consciously tries to carve out his own niche in Modernism.  An early
work (1926) written under the influence of both Stravinsky and Gershwin
(the Concerto in F appeared in 1925), it shows a young man's desire to
be taken seriously.  I don't know how the first audiences took it, but
it thrilled me from its opening bars.  Like the Gershwin concerto, it
shouts "New York!" from its first measures, with thrusting upward leaps
followed by soaring cantabile.  This is not the folky Copland of the
"American" ballets, but you recognize the composer nevertheless.  Jazz
was still in the air, and Copland at this stage explored it as a way of
writing characteristically American music.  He gave it up shortly
thereafter.  Copland divides the concerto into two related parts, played
without break, and writes extremely tersely.  Each note says a lot.
There's also a funny, jazz-vamp section, initiated by solo piano, with
a melody that foreshadows the 1944 Jule Styne song, "Poor Little Rhode
Island." It stands out so that you wonder whether Styne had ever heard
the Copland.  The soloist often gets to lurch into his part, as if drunk,
dull-witted, or simply not very good, but it's all written in and indeed
constitutes part of the rhythmic challenge of the concerto.

One associates Earl Wild with Liszt and Rachmaninoff, rather than with
modern music (other than Gershwin), but he turns in a marvelous performance
of both concerti.  The Menotti fizzes and sings with a light touch, and
Jorge Mester matches Wild with an accompaniment that sparkles.  My only
reservation is Copland and the Symphony of the Air.  Copland can't keep
the cross-rhythms in his own concerto quite together, and the orchestra
sounds in spots like they're holding on.  I did prefer Bernstein's
recording with Copland as soloist (Sony 60177 or 2-CD set Sony 47232;
the latter has a bunch of early Copland, 1923-1935) - broader,
fuller-sounding, and rhythmically more compelling.

The Vanguard sound as presented on the CD improves on my LP enormously.
In fact, the tinny, puny scratch from my record player led me to seek
out the Copland/Bernstein in the first place.  The CD incarnation is
both rich and clear as a bell.

Steve Schwartz

             ***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery.  For more information,
go to:  http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2