Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Wed, 10 May 2000 15:36:00 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bernard Chasen writes, in reply to Danny Tan:
>Two great nineteenth century omissions: Schumann and Grieg.
Essential!
>Medtner: Two concerti.
Actually, three.
>Bartok: All three are wonderful, in different ways.
Essential.
>Prokofiev- wrote 5, I believe.
Correct.
>The second is a favorite of mine.
Likewise.
>The Naxos set has received high praise.
Justly.
>Rautavaara - I have not heard the one just recorded by the dedicatee,
>Ashkenazi, but the earlier ones are very good - perhaps his best
>work, IMHO.
The new third is wonderfully ethereal. The first is a spectacular bravura
work.
>Busoni- unique- complete with chorus!!
Essential.
To which I must add:
Barber - as lyrical as his violin concerto.
Stenhammar - the first is on the same grand scale as the Brahms 2nd. It's
hard to believe that this was Stenhammar's Op. 1.
Chopin 1 and 2 - Chopin's orchestral writing "gets no respect", but so
what.
Atterberg - the new recording just continues to grow on me. The big moment
in the 2nd movement is breathtaking.
Strauss - Burleske - not really a concerto but great fun, especially with
its prominent timpani.
Brahms 1 - *the* "desert island" concerto for me.
I'm sure I'm overlooking some obscurities I'm devoted to...
len.
|
|
|