CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Harbin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Moderated Classical Music List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:28:44 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I've read on this List and widely elsewhere and never read a satisfactory
explanation of how the critics were so badly duped.  Someone did mention
slight alterations to sound quality but can this account for missing the
huges variants in sound and style accross a wide spectrum of painists,
orchestras, engineering .... ?  It baffles me.

I appreciate the generousity of those who see critics as victims too.
To a certain extent I agree as they are good people who were duped.
However review magazines often hold themsleves out a experts and people
bought Hatto CDs based on their expert reviews.  If you bought a fake
painting from Christies after an expert said it was genuine in similar
circumstances (wide vagrancies in style etc) I wonder if we would come
to similar conclusions?

David Harbin
Nottingham UK

             ***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery.  For more information,
go to:  http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2