Prelude & Fugue in D major - The prelude is by most accounts one of humor,
joy, and ceremony.  But I feel there's much more going on in the details
of the music which only Gould and Tureck examine.  Their readings reveal
the mastery of Bach with Gould taking first place mainly by virtue of
a soundstage just perfect for revealing details and an aristocratic
interpretation.  Tureck's sound, at best, doesn't interfere with one's
concentration.

The D major Fugue is generally played as reflective and uplifting music
with a contrasting assertiveness toward the conclusion.  There is much
oferlapping of subject entrances (stretti) which really constitutes the
technical foundation of the music.  Every version is rewarding; Hewitt and
Schepkin are particularly reflective, Gould uses his staccato approach to
good effect, Schiff's reading is gorgeous, and Gulda is highly assertive
from the start.  Tureck's is the most rewarding; her reading is throughly
a meditative one which best highlights the stretti.

prelude & Fugue in D minor - The Prelude is wild and powerful music.
In excellent performances, propulsion and precision are prevalent as
well as a strong focus on the nuances of the piece.  Six versions have
significant lackings - Roberts, Nikolayeva, Aldwell, and Schepkin are
too matter-of-fact, missing the nuances as great passages come and go
with little notice.  Schiff gets stalled, losing the propulsion.  Fischer
is simply unidiomatic with fierce sound.  Gould, Gulda, and Hewitt are
excellent; Hewitt is a little short on propulsion but handles the nuances
beautifully.  Jando and Tureck are superb.  Jando gets everything right,
and Tureck provides a suspenseful and sinister reading.

So far, Nikolayeva is a good example of the overall strength of the
competition.  Although she is toward the bottom of the competitive field,
her performances have been at least enjoyable and often much better.  But
whenever she delivers a first-rate reading, one or more other versions gets
closer to the core of the music.

The D minor Fugue has tension, depth, dynamic shading, and a sense of the
macabre throughout, but Roberts doesn't really touch those facets in his
performance.  It's as if he's saying - "I played it straight and strong.
What's next?" The other versions are fine with Tureck, Nikolayeva, and
Gould being special.  Tureck is slow paced, highly detailed, tense, and
emotionally strong.  Nikolyeva highlights the macabre elements beautifully.
Gould has an unusual and infectious pacing with much drama.  Overall, Gould
is showing he has much to offer beyond precision, speed, and clarity.  He
often displays a great sense of drama, poetry, and subtlety.  He has the
total package in his own unique way.

Prelude & Fugue in E flat major - The Prelude is delicate, beautiful,
seamless, serene, subtle, and joyful.  Having just spoken very well of
Gould, I have to relate that his prelude is absurdly fast and possesses
none of the qualities mentioned above.  Fischer is fast and rather
oppressive.  Schiff is ordinary.  Tureck, Roberts, Nikolayeva, Hewitt,
Gulda, and Jando give fine performances.  Tureck is the slowest paced and
very clinical; this has its own rewards, but I did miss some warmth and
joy.  Schepkin and Aldwell are exceptional.  Schepkin's reading, of average
tempo, is a great mainstream performance having all the elements of the
music in perfect unison.  Aldwell is relatively slow, infectious, dreamy,
and yet highly detailed; his combination of seamless flow and detail is
stunning.

The four-part E flat major fugue is a life-affirming and moderately
assertive piece which only three versions are found lacking in:  Hewitt,
Schiff, and Nikolayeva.  Hewitt is quick and choppy, Schiff is quick and
trivializes the music, and Nikolayeva is too heavy-handed.  The other
versions are good with Fischer outstanding.  His reading is slow paced,
detailed, and possesses much poetry and tension without any key banging.
There is some bad sound to overcome, but the performance warrants it.

Prelude & Fugue in D sharp minor - The Prelude is bitter/sweet music
which Bach writes so well.  Gould provides a war-like reading which might
be appropriate for a "Lethal Weapon" movie but not for this prelude; he
starts off by racing through the music and then he blasts his way through
the first repeat.  This does not meet minimum standards.

Most of the other versions are good with a tendency to lose interest
in the second half of the prelude.  But, Hewitt and Tureck are excellent
throughout.  Hewitt's reading is gourgeous while Tureck's is slow paced and
incisive.  Speaking of Tureck, her set is so far the best of the surveyed
versions.  I don't think she has yet to deliver a sub-standard performance,
and they have often been among the best or simply the absolute best.

Tureck's tempos are relatively slow as she brings to the forefront great
detail, poetry, command of counterpoint, and an incisiveness of the highest
order.  The sound can be troublesome, but great performances relegate that
factor to a minimal status.  And, unlike Gould, every performance which is
far off the "norm" is musically enlightening and represents a favorable
interpretive decision.

The Fugue in D sharp minor is generally considered dark and mournful music
with a few rays of light interspersed; it's not easy music to appreciate
quickly.  I've spent two days with this fugue and concluded that, for me,
a strong sense of tension without downplaying the poetic elements of the
music enhances my musical enlightenment.  Nikolayeva and Jando are the best
versions; they don't get bogged down in any sentimentality, are highly
poetic, and display strong tension throughout.

Aldwell, Schepkin, Schiff, Tureck, and Hewitt are excellent performances.
So is Gould whose reading, although the quickest, maintains a high degree
of poetry.  Fischer, Gulda, and Roberts, have problems.  Fischer's sound in
soft passages tends to fade away, and louder passages are shrill; Fischer's
performance just isn't good enough to overcome the poor sound.  Gulda is
somewhat mechanical and detached.  Roberts has a nice quick pace, but he
glides on the music's surface.

Overall, Gulda is ranking fairly high in the survey.  He reminds me some of
Gould in terms of priority on clarity, precision, and counterpoint.  But,
Gulda does not display the dynamic and emotional range of Gould, and his
recorded sound is less appealing; this is most obvious with louder high
notes which tend to have a piercing/ping-like quality.

Don Satz
[log in to unmask]