Mats Norrman wrote:

>Why don't you try Pierre Boulez Mahler? He's great in Mahelr!  Sounds
>exactly like Barbirolli....

Hang on a minute, Mats.  Are you talking about JOHN Barbirolli? Because
Boulez's interpretations of Mahler are about as far from Barbirolli's as
it is possible to get.

Tony Duggan, England.
Mahler recordings survey:
http://www.musicweb.uk.net/Mahler/index.html