Ramon Khalona wrote:

>Here's the playlist:
>
>...
>B8: D. Russell Davies/Bruckner Orch. Linz (BOL, 2002)
>...

I will try to make it, although not the whole thing.  I gave you
incorrect info a prior e- mail.  It was Soudant, not Stenz who did the
Bruckner 4.  Would you like to substitute it for Kertesz, since probably
no one in California has heard it?

Where can i obtain the D.R. Davies 8?

Alan Stone

Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: (qmail 81430 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 22:20:16 -0000
Received: from home.ease.lsoft.com (209.119.1.31)
  by ezera.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 22:20:16 -0000
Received: from home (home.ease.lsoft.com) by home.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:19:30 -0400
Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net by home.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for
          Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed,
          6 Aug 2003 18:19:30 -0400
Received: from KAYNSTEVE ([68.212.103.167]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with SMTP
          id <20030806221913.PRBG27767.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@KAYNSTEVE>;
          Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:19:13 -0400
From: "Steve Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Howells and Stevens
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:19:24 -0500
Status: O

This message was originally submitted  by [log in to unmask] to the CLASSICAL
list at HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM. If you simply forward it back to the list, using a
mail command  that generates "Resent-" fields  (ask your local user  support or
consult  the documentation  of  your mail  program  if in  doubt),  it will  be
distributed  and  the  explanations  you   are  now  reading  will  be  removed
automatically. If on the other hand you edit the contributions you receive into
a digest, you will have to  remove this paragraph manually. Finally, you should
be able  to contact  the author  of this  message by  using the  normal "reply"
function of your mail program.

----------------- Message requiring your approval (10 lines) ------------------
Stephen E. Bacher responded to me:

>>The work answers the question of whether a non-believer can write a
>>successful sacred work resoundingly in the affirmative.
>
>Hasn't that been already answered by RVW's work?

Yes and yes.  Also, probably by Verdi as well.

Steve Schwartz