Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 26 Sep 2000 18:21:35 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Don Satz writes about Denis Fodor's Adorno animadversions:
>The above is just the sort of comment that exacerbates hostilities; I
>don't see the point at all of making these remarks. Just because I don't
>like a particular type of music or even detest it does not make it some
>sub-standard garbage, except to me. And that's what this is all about -
>taking a personal view and expanding it to cover the entire realm. That
>is not reasonable.
Lookit, what we're talking about here is NOT aggrandizing a personal view.
Rather, it's about assaying the sum of personal views that make up the
reaction to a piece of music by an audience. It's about Denis Fodor's
personal experience with attenders of big-hall concerts,. It's about
his contention that these attenders generally find avant garde stuff (eg
atonal, serial, aleatory) ugly. The purpose of bringing this up was not to
"exarcerbate hostily" -- a phrase that, incidentally, implies that hostility
existed in the first place -- but simply to state an opinion. There has
been opinion aplenty going the other way. Are we about muzzling one sort
of opinion here?
Denis Fodor
|
|
|