Why is it so difficult to simultaneously appreciate the great 
accomplishments of skep beekeepers AND the innovation of Langstroth?  They 
are LIVING examples of how beekeepers can come up with very different, 
creative and functional solutions to similar problems.  Like Allen, I 
lament that skep beekeeping is not more widely practiced as I think 
diversity is important to innovation.

In light of this remarkable ingenuity, I find it surprising that Allen 
would heap the blame of our narrowed perspective on the "stifling" 
influence of state and provincial inspectors.  This over estimates the 
influence of the inspectors and give beekeepers too little credit for 
their ability to think for themselves.  Personally the inspectors I have 
met have been knowledgeable, helpful and well-respected.  They do not 
warrant this blame.
  
It would be interesting to know if non-movable frame beekeeping was at all 
prevalent at the time of the Bee Acts or if it had already gone into 
decline.

Adony

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---