BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:12:48 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
>
> > The average percentage of bees drifting from untreated hives infested
> with varroa into neighbouring treated hives did not exceed 3%
>

I wouldn't put a great deal of stock in that 3% number, as there are a
number of issues with the experimental design.  The amount of drift was
checked at 14 days after marking the newly-emerged bees, which would be
early to expect them to be flying much.  Plus less than half the marked
bees were recovered, either in their parent hive or in any other hive.

I suspect that the actual amount of drift exceeded 3% by some factor.
Let's arbitrarily adjust it to 5% so that we can do some math.

 If an infested colony contained say 40,000 bees at 50% infestation rate of
the adult bees (reasonable for a collapsing colony), then that hive would
contain 20,000 infested adult bees.  If 5% of them drifted during 2 weeks,
that would be 2000 mites being transferred to other colonies by drifting
alone (not counting robbing).

2000 mites being transmitted to adjacent colonies over a 2 week period of
time is still a lot of immigration.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2