>I am not interested in wasting anymore of my time in such dialogue.

Wow, this is the most disingenuous reply imaginable!  I agree with every
one of Pete's criticisms of the paper.  As I read it, I choked on error
after error, and the stretching of findings to support the authors' biases.
 I also found it to be uninformed and disrespectful of the earnest efforts
by the EPA to ensure acceptable risk management.

For someone who "wasted" so much time in writing such an obtuse and lengthy
paper, I find it unforgivable to blow off appropriate and clear criticism.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm