BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:47:51 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Dave writes:
You may equate outbreeding with better genetics, but
outbreeding does not result in 'better genetics', just
greater 'diversity'.

Reply:
Yes, and this is needed for variability expansion for more
choice after stabilizing with survivialability. From then
on, time of year is used in a  modified outbreeding
program, but it is a  time-consuming process. 

Dave continues:
One very good reason for using II in a closed population is
to ensure that the diversity within that population is kept
high enough.

Reply:
Still, why could not II be used with an open-mated program
with time of year selection/usage to help with more uniform
matings of selected breeders for both queens and drones in
the field?

Respectfully submitted,

Dee A. Lusby
Small Cell Commercial Beekeeper
Moyza, Arizona
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/organicbeekeepers/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2