BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gordon Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Dec 1996 22:41:25 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, Joel Govostes wrote:
 
> What is of further fascination is that a colony is made up
> of several sub-colonies. That is, the queen can mate with
> a number of drones.  So you end up with many sub-colonies,
> each composed of sisters from a common drone-father.  Yet,
> the colony still works together.
 
Here's an interesting further thought.
 
It's fairly clear that workers pass on a maximum of their
own genetic material by being nursemaids etc. for their queen
sisters. That's what they get out of being 'slaves' for the queen.
 
In a queenless colony, they will try to attract in a newly mated
queen from elsewhere. What do they get out of this? They will
live out their own personal lifespan. Any queen sistrs stand
a fair chance withour without a new queen. Why attract in a
'alien' queen?
 
Regards,
--
Gordon Scott   [log in to unmask]      [log in to unmask] (work)
The Basingstoke Beekeeper (newsletter)      [log in to unmask]
<A HREF="http://www.apis.demon.co.uk">Gordon's Apis Home Page</A>
Beekeeper; Kendo 3rd Dan; Sometime sailor.  Hampshire, England.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2