BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:30:04 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
> Two  the bees are better than we think at avoiding them  It was darn near arousing to learn that the bees KNOW the pollen is taitnted.   I wonder if that applies to other pesticides also.

I am not sure they are so good at avoiding it.  It was bee collected pollen that they were feeding.  That means the pyrethroid tainted pollen was brought back to the hive.  It is probably fair to assume that it would have been stored as well.  The question then is would they haul it out after "tasting" it or avoid it, but then consume it in a time of dearth?  Is this contaminated pollen a bit of time bomb waiting for a pollen shortage to go off?  It seems likely that they would consume it if there were no alternative pollen sources.

Adam
Barrie, ON
             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2