BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:55:00 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I've been at meetings on CCD and ARS planning in Florida.  Sorry about  a 
short message in response to George's loss and some subsequent  confusion.  
Please let me clarify.
 
The latest hypothesis being circulated among beekeepers is that CCD is  
because of a failure of one or more of the pollen substitutes - based on  the 
observation that bees won't take/consume the material.  
 
One of the first symptoms that we noticed was that once the disorder seems  
to start to play out - the bees won't take ANY feed - syrup, pollen sub,  etc.  
Its like you or I when we have stomach flu - the bees don't  want, won't take 
any food.
 
We've seen CCD in hives with 30-40 pounds of honey, pollen stores,  etc.
 
What I meant by my statement that it may not be the pollen sub, but it may  
be your old equipment is this -- in several CCD cases that we've  examined, 
when beekeepers combined or stacked good bees on CCD boxes/frames --  all of the 
bees collapsed.  In a few cases, or if the boxes have been open  to the air 
for several weeks, the bees appeared to be ok. So by old equipment, I  didn't 
mean to imply poor equipment, I meant combs from CCD hives.
 
Jerry
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free 
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
http://www.aol.com.

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2