BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 May 2013 08:31:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
"Each minister was presumably briefed by technical advisors specialised in agricultural science. The moratorium was based on the science provided by the European Food Safety Authority."

So, peer review is now performed by the (aptly named) House of Peers?  I don't care who briefed whom.....no one (especially a politician) is actually evaluating science by being briefed by "technical advisers".

deknow

"The House of Peers did nothing in particular, and did it very well"
-Gilbert and Sullivan

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2