BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter de Bruyn Kops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 2008 08:21:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>--- J. Waggle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I am in support of the CCD investigation, but the
>habit of grouping all unexplained losses under the
>category of CCD is IMO, counter productive, and will
>hamper honest efforts to find the real cause.

Joe's statement sums up my view and, I suspect, views 
of the other northerners arguing against automatic CCD 
diagnoses of winter deadouts with few remaining bees.
During the past decade in New Hampshire, we've seen major 
winter losses (50-90%) on a 2-3 year cycle in operations 
that run 50-200 colonies.  If weather permits some flight at
time of death, then the hives are empty.  Otherwise the
corpses pile up on the bottom board.  Mortality rates correlate
with varroa levels in August and September, including varroa
levels in neighboring operations.  I explained the mechanism
in a post last month.

I remember a talk by Dewey Caron just before CCD broke where 
he described a 3-year cycle of major losses as being 'normal'
in the Northeast.  I believe he pinned the blame on varroa.

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2