BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:29:17 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
< Those figures proved to be anomalies, though, and have not been replicated
by other researchers (Schmuck 2004).  So we must ask ourselves, how could
Suchail have found a level of toxicity so far out of line compared to the
results of other researchers?

Randy, will/can you confirm that you really mean Richard Schmuck from Bayer
SA, Division AGRO, Puteaux, France?

If that is the one you base on your attitude about neonicotinoids, then it
is better to close our discussion, sorry!

Kind regards,

Ghislain De Roeck,
Belgium.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2