BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:42:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Cornell has published this report which just came to my attention: 
http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/2011/10/native-bees-are-better-pollinators-honeybees

I am an advocate for native bees, as well as honey bees, but I sure don't 
like to see this hype. They should know better.

This is not a legitimate comparison - between native bees and poorly managed 
honey bees. Any pollination contractor who puts out honey bees will manage 
his bees to push them to pollen collection by maximizing open brood. If they 
are only seeking nectar in the flowers, the contractor has not done his job.

When I did apple pollination, I worked hard to achieve foragers that would 
"doggie paddle" though the stamens.


Dave Green
Retired

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2