BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: The molecular basis of simple relationships between exposure concentration andtoxic effects with time.
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 May 2013 17:18:30 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Ghislain, we've been over Abbink's paper time and again.  Why keep bringing
up one sentence from an obscure and  old paper, when recent experts on
neonic chemistry and physiology have confirmed that the statement was in
error, and is completely unsupported by either field or lab data?

Jim Fischer's post is absolutely correct on every point.  It helps to
explain why some of us are so frustrated that Tennekes unsubstantiated
hypothesis is getting the amount of attention that it is.
-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2