BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Metro Propolis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 May 2015 16:15:44 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> One mole of a gas will fill 22.4 liters (just over half a deep), and Acetic is 60 grams per mole. So, those using 80% 


> acetic will need to start with 125% of the calculated amount of solution. Using 99%, you'd only need 101% of the  
> calculated amount.

Based on this, it sounds like using @ 99% confers neither advantage nor disadvantage - one just needs to use less than the volume of recommended 80%.



> I remember Andony Melathopoulos giving a talk in the past few years about a
> study they ran comparing Acetic, Heat, and E-Beam.   I am pretty sure he used 80% acetic.

Time and time again, we come back to 80%.   I still find myself wondering if at some point in the past, this was simply the most commonly available concentration, which lead to the simplification of Bailey's original recommendation of =/>80%, to simply  =80%.

Based on responses, I see no reason *not* to use my 99%, undiluted - I can just use less of it.

Thank you to everyone who responded.

     

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2