>Its obvious few if no one read the link to the actual paper.

My computer would not display the paper but I have been involved with the
fight against temik for years.

>Just for the record Temik did not show up in ANY of the orange samples if I
>recall and the basis of pulling the label was a concern about trace levels
>in some produce that affects YOUNG children!!!

One paper does not make a important statistic. Temik has been banned on
orange for years so the study should not have found temik in orange juice
unless applied illegally. Temik problems in OJ occurred before IMID use was
adopted and IMID use is banned close to harvest (and surely you understand
why ).

Shark attacks in Florida are usually found on the last page of the newspaper
and temik in OJ was kept quiet for obvious reasons. Once temik was banned
for orange those people making noise (myself) dropped the issue.

Does anyone on this list not understand that a systemic pesticide is found
in EVERY part of the plant?

Science does not dispute the fact nor does the chemical industry.

The *problem* lies with what the chemical industry and the FDA consider safe
for humans to inject. The U.K. banned temik years ago! The U.S. is years
late in its ban.

These are busy times for me so I have little time for comment but hopefully
the above will make the issue clear.

The radiator went out in a swinger and need to get the new one installed
today before the 90 plus temps arrive.

bob

.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm