BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:29:15 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>
> > In this case, surely they are not 'dinks' but those rare colonies that
> managed to shrug off a devastating problem, and so might have the special
> genetics


Interesting point, Gavin.  Last year, during the height of CCD, I spoke with
several almond pollinators who left yards of dinks behind (including
myself).  We were often surprised when we returned to those yards later in
spring, that the colonies had *miraculously* recovered (no I'm not talking
about faith type miracles).

I closely observed two colonies that were struggling with sacbrood or
sacbrood-like symptoms completely (visually) eliminate the problem, and then
go on to rebound.

None of us were trying to save dinks--we were just leaving what we thought
were going to be deadouts behind.  The general consensus was that a good
spring pollen flow allowed the colonies to recover.

Whether these colonies had special genetics, I don't know.  Looks more like
a recovery from nutritional stress, or an activation of the antiviral immune
response.  I've got more questions than answers!

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2