BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Walt Barricklow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 1997 13:36:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
I like the number of zeros that you use much better than what I make.
 
----------
> From: Andy Nachbar <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: POLLINATION RESULTS
> Date: Sunday, October 19, 1997 12:28 PM
>
> <excerpt>
>
> </excerpt>
>
> <excerpt>Honeybees and beekeepers acknowledged as responsible for bumper
> crops of cranberries, ($1,400,000,000,000.00 or 1.4 billion $$)in areas
> reported by others as having lost 90% of the bee populations? Check it
> out on the ABC News web page below.
>
>
> What ever your slant on the hype and misinformation still being passed
> like the wind on the reported the loss of all feral bees and much of the
> hive bee populations the facts seem to be the effect on agriculture has
> been limited as the 1997 crop reports come in for the year and all the
> bee, honeybee,(feral and hive) pollinated crops report record yields with
> Cranberries taking the dollar lead from the 1996 and 1997 billion dollar
> California almond crop.
>
>
>  http://www.abcnews.com/sections/business/harvest/harvest_cran.html
>
> </excerpt>
>
>   ttul, the OLD Drone

ATOM RSS1 RSS2