BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Nicholson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Jun 1999 18:50:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
At 18:51 -0700 6/1/99, Garth wrote:
>Hi All
>
>Just to comment on the suggestion that laying workers cannot fly - I
>beleive this is highly unlikely - a worker bee can fly carrying a
>dead drone - well over twice her weight. She can fly carrying a
>polystyrene ping pong bal!! A worker is a machine - hse can fly very
>well - in fact a queens wings are so similar to a workers, that if
>this laying worker cannot fly concept were correct, a laying worker
>would have to be bigger than a queen.


Maybe it's an issue of the laying workers center of gravity. Any
flying machine has an acceptable CG range and outside of that range,
stable flight is not possible. A tail heavy bee would stall when it
tries to fly.

Paul

ATOM RSS1 RSS2