BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:55:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> Here's and old url for downsizing in someone elses words
>
> http://www.beesource.com/eob/4dot9/index.htm

This appears to be a success story, but a success in getting bees to draw 
5.2 mm cells, not 4.9mm.

Pretty well all the natural comb I find in the wild where I live averages 
around 5.2mm.

Also, the article states,

"Seeing that our country was founded upon and originally used 4.83mm cell 
sizing...".

Really?

allen 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2