BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:23:01 +1300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
>
> Question:
> 
> Would that honey be considered adultered honey by carbon (c13 v/s c14)
> testing in any other criteria?
> 
 Advice from one of our New Zealand scientists
>Yes, they will be considered adulterated
under the testing criteria...as the test doesn't differentiate whether
bees find the C4 sugar themselves or are fed it by humans!!! Remember the
M&M's fiasco in France where the honey turned blue and red?


The honey would need to have some slick
environmental marketing to leverage off the situation, as technically honey
is made from nectar, not cane sap (but technically it is not much different
to honeydew...could you call the honey 'canedew' or 'candydew' honey?



cheers

Karyne

____________
___________________ 

  

Dr Karyne Rogers

Senior Scientist

Environment and Materials Division

National Isotope Center, GNS Science  		 	   		  
             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2