BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:02:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>
> >The hives in Dr. Lu study DID NOT collapse from high varroa load when
> examined by knowledgeable beekeepers.
>

I'm curious about this statement, Bob.  What is your source of information?
 Are you basing it on the following sentence from the paper?
"The loss of imidacloprid-
treated hives in this study is also highly unlikely
due to pathogen infection since the presence of neither
Nosema nor a large number of Varroa mites was
observed in hives during the summer and fall seasons."

Bob, in your experience as a commercial beekeeper, in colonies having a
minimum of 14 frames of brood in May, but not treated in any way for mites
until Oct 5, and then treated with Apistan, would you expect those colonies
to survive the winter?

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2