BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ross Langlands <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:21:06 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
> Poor old GPs like myself have taken a lot of stick on this
> thread regarding
> their inability to diagnose allergies.
> Briefly bee stings can induce:-
> 1. Local allergic reactions. These are defined as an area of redness
> exceeding 5 cm at the site of a sting.
> 2. Anaphylaxis. These include all reactions anywhere else in
> the body and
> may proceed to anaphylactic shock and death. This too is an allergic
> reaction
> 3. Toxic reactions. These are dependent on dose of toxin i.e number of
> stings and can produce fever headaches, vomiting, collapse
> and death. This
> can occur with an excess of 25 stings.
> 1 can lead to 2, but not necessarily. 3 can be associated
> with 1 and 2.
>
> Jerry speaks a lot of sense when he says "The notion that
> infrequent bee
> stings induce allergies (implied from these
> posts) and multiple stings do not is patently wrong." The
> first sting can
> produce little reaction and it's only subsequent stings that
> produce an
> allergic reaction either local or anaphylactic.
> He's also right to point out that "People tend to either get
> less reactive
> OR more reactive with successive
> stings, whether accumulated over a long time, or in one massive dose."
> He also states that reactions can be unpredictable which is
> also spot on.
>
> On this side of the pond allergists are not big business. In
> fact there are
> no medically qualified allergists in Scotland that I know of.
> Desensitisation has not been readily available in General
> Practice since the
> 80s because of deaths due to anaphylaxis following the
> injections and the
> lack of evidence that they were effective. Also there were no
> financial
> rewards for treating patients with desensitisation therapy.
> Prevention of
> allergic reactions is not seen here as possible or a
> priority. Treatment of
> local reactions remains antihistamines and steroid creams; of
> anaphylaxis,
> epipens, steroids, fluids and antihistamines and of toxicity general
> supportive measures
>
> I hope this offers a little clarity and some support for your
> local GP.
>
> Ross Langlands
>
> **********************************************************************
> The information contained in this message may be confidential
> or legally privileged and is intended for the addressee only,
> If you have received this message in error or there are any
> problems please notify the originator immediately. The
> unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this
> message is strictly forbidden.
> **********************************************************************
>
--

**********************************************************************
The information contained in this message may be confidential or legally privileged and is intended for the addressee only, If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden.
**********************************************************************

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2