BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"E.t. Ash" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 May 2015 07:21:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines)
At least when I lived there Louisiana had pretty much the same law as Alabama.  The law allowed transport across the state and the importation of bees only on new equipment.  As far as the history of this law it was more about the concerns that Randy Oliver suggest (crowding out of existing native beekeepers) than anything that has to do with pest or pathogen.  Basically there is a small strip of geography in the very southern part of the state that was premier queen rearing area.  This basically works out that if you wish to take up queen rearing there you pretty much are forced to buy out an existing beekeeper. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2