BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stellio Matson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 May 2014 09:46:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> Science by press release.
 
And very few of those dozen+ articles that have appeared in the popular
press about this Harvard study mention Bayer's response to the study:
http://www.bayercropscience.us/news/press-releases/2014/05122014-bee-care-harvard-statement

Excerpts:

a) Feeding honey bees levels of neonicotinoids greater than 10 times what they 
would normally encounter is more than unrealistic – it is deceptive and represents 
a disservice to genuine scientific investigation related to honey bee health.

b) Given the artificially high levels tested over 13 consecutive weeks, the
colony failure rates observed are completely expected.  

c) Unfortunately, this latest study conducted by Dr. Lu repeats the
fundamental flaws seen in his previous research and provides no 
meaningful information regarding honey bee risk assessment.  

Paul Cherubini
El Dorado, Calif.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2