BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Art, Bill, MNH" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 May 2001 09:38:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I agree w/ you about the scut.  I worked w/ them for three and half yrs in
Paraguay and I feel they produced fine honey.  One just needs to work them a
different way and it is possible to take advantage of their positive traits
as you mentioned.  In Paraguay, I never had to medicate.

Bill




-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Sergeant [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 4:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Africanized hybrids


If it pleases you, I would be happy to offer any information in my
possession you require on the African bee, AM scutellata. I work with
scuts on a daily basis. One question I would raise would be simply,
why has the scut been so demonised and its positive attributes
ignored? Its positive attributes are almost endless, and many such
attributes are totally lacking or partially lacking in other races of honey
bee. Examples include the scuts' inherent resistance to pests and
disease, eg, small hive beetle, and new problems (in Africa) such as
chalkbrood and EF. And so on. When you have so many good things
going for you, as the scut has, may not misbehaviour be understood,
or even expected, at least on occasion?

By the way, the jury is still out on verroa and the scut.

Barry Sergeant
Kyalami
South Africa

ATOM RSS1 RSS2