BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:38:02 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Aug 31, 2013, at 9:50 AM, randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>> My impression is that Apivar (Amitraz) is a safer chemical than Apistan
> (fluvalinate-tau) for bees, beekeeper and hive products, but I don't have
> any conclusive data on this.  Maybe our researchers can comment.

Considering the fact that varroa quickly becomes resistant to amitraz, and considering it has been used for 30 years, I would steer clear of it.

> To keep the infestation at an acceptable level in autumn of 1985, all colonies were treated twice with Varamit®, an acaricide product containing amitraz.

Additionally, the re-influx of mites has to been understood:

> Mite infestation levels were generally low until the middle of July 1985. Subsequently, and sometimes as late as the middle of September, most colonies experienced a very rapid increase in the mite population. 

-- Jovan M. Kulincevic and Thomas E. Rinderer
             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2