BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gordon Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Jan 1996 18:00:22 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
On Tue, 23 Jan 1996, BusyKnight wrote:
 
> FYI, most state laws prohibit a beekeeper from keeping a beehive
> that does not have removable frames.  Being able to lift the
> honeycomb frames out of the hive (without damaging the hive)
> has been one of man's greatest improvements to keeping bees
> and collecting honey.  ....
 
A natural honey-bee nest would normally be inside some kind of
cavity like a tree trunk, roofspace, cave or the like.
 
There is a type of hive used in Africa and a number of other
places, known as a top-bar hive, where the combs are drawn
down from just a top bar and there are no complete frames as
in a conventional western hive. If you want to follow up the
'natural hive' idea, you could investigate the principles of
the top-bar and interpret into a natural-like hive. Maybe a
hollowed out log or similar? This would enable the combs to be
removed for inspections whilst maintaining a natural look.
 
        ============================
        {}  (%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%)  {}
        {}  (%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%)  |
        {}  (%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%)  | <-- window
         {  (%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%)  |
          {  \________________/  }
            ___________________
 
--
Gordon Scott   [log in to unmask]   Hampshire, England.
               [log in to unmask]
               Beekeeper; Kendo 3rd Dan; Sometime sailor.
The Basingstoke Beekeeper (newsletter) [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2