BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alan Fiala <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:32:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
I've just come back from vacation, so this is a late comment on the
local ordinance somewhere in Colorado. I wondered why someone had tried
to reinvent the wheel - and come up with an egg! It was way too wordy
and tried to deal with too much detail, particularly in defining
"nuisance". It seemed more concerned with detailing worst-case scenarios
of "nuisance" than with good guidelines for beekeeping.

1. I've been led to believe by those who should know that skeps
(non-removeable comb) have been illegal in the U.S. since the early 20th
century, when AFB became a major problem. Did you ask the state Dept. of
Agriculture about state laws governing this?

2. Why not just use an ordinance already on the books in other places?
For a good example, see "Ordinances Banning Bees" in the ABC and XYZ of
Beekeeping, 1990 edition. The local ordinances here in Fairfax Co VA
were written by the state extension service beekeepers and are very
little different from the Long Island ordinances cited in ABC - the
county code is online. There is also a "model ordinance" on-line at the
University of Florida Extension Service.

Alan Fiala
Fairfax County, VA

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2