BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:00:57 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
mark berninghausen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:Didn't Dadant have a frame and coresponding super in which the frame was almost square and therefore gave the queen a vast area to lay in? Seems I remember discussions about a hive like that, square frames.  It had frames as long as the current ones but were as deep as they were wide.  The thought that immediately came to mind was, "How would you like to lift that sucker when it was full of honey?".  It would be as much heavier than the current standard brood chamber as the Illinois super is to the shallow super.  I, for one, would NOT want to lift that thing.  Those hives were in use for a while but as far as I can tell never came into standard use.

Mike   Located in lower Alabama  (LA)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2