BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: locally adapted bees are best - a few comments
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:19:37 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
Well stated Steve,   We also have the same problem  in my opinion with nucs.   Lack of standards  3 frame 4 frame,  mediums etc  as well as just made up?  Queen laying for how long?  Etc.


So my question to all is what can we do to establish standards???  The Indusstry of package bees has them now,  and   we talk of complete hives as singles or doubles etc.

So can we is some semi formal situation set standards for things like Locally adapted,  Nucs,  Mite restiant etc??  


Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2