BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: bee health and the use of neonics in Australia
From:
Little Wolf Apiaries -our bees get all the attraction <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:29:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Bil Harley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> PLB stated, " In areas where neonics were banned, the bees didn't get
> better. Show one case where banning neonics made a significant improvement
> in bee health. It's disappointing when the scape goat dies and nothing
> happens.
>
> Amazing news, may I ask where these "areas" are?
>
>
Bil,
One area is Leon,
because the guest French beekeeper I had in my beeyard last summer told me
all about their problems
exactly what PLB speaks of.

Walter
littlewolfapiaries.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2